<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Playing on the frontier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siphon9.net/loune/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siphon9.net/loune</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:08:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NTLM authentication in PHP &#8211; Now with NTLMv2 hash checking by Bhargav</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2009/09/ntlm-authentication-in-php-now-with-ntlmv2-hash-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-21721</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhargav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=68#comment-21721</guid>
		<description>Nice article. I am totally new about this NTLM &amp; LDAP.

This will surely help me to complete my Client&#039;s requirement. But addition to this i am also looking for the same what Hossain asked for in previous comment.

---------------------------
how can I use this code to check for the username and pass from the central AD instead of the local DB

Your reply/help will really be appreciated.

Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. I am totally new about this NTLM &amp; LDAP.</p>
<p>This will surely help me to complete my Client&#8217;s requirement. But addition to this i am also looking for the same what Hossain asked for in previous comment.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
how can I use this code to check for the username and pass from the central AD instead of the local DB</p>
<p>Your reply/help will really be appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dictionary Model Binder in ASP.NET MVC2 and MVC3 by Jörgen L</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2010/11/dictionary-model-binder-in-asp-net-mvc2-and-mvc3/comment-page-1/#comment-21559</link>
		<dc:creator>Jörgen L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=157#comment-21559</guid>
		<description>Im using this code but have made a pair of modifications that I think are of value:

1. The code is failing miserably in regard to performance in a case where the element of the dictionary is an object, especially if it is a recursive structure where the element in itself contains a dictionary, since it will rebind the same dictionary each time it finds a reference to it, ie. for each field in the contained element. I solved that by adding a dictionary to use as a lookup table where I add each model name that has been bound, skipping entries in the key loop if the found dictionary is already bound. In my application this changed the time to bind from 10 seconds to non-noticable, changing the total number of iterations in the key loop from 250 thousand times to a few hundred...

2. Since I render the dictionary values in a separate partial view this gave the effect on naming that the fields were named like &quot;dict.[key]&quot; instead of &quot;dict[key]&quot;. I changed the condition for matching the model name to test for both variants, which solved my problem.

With those modifications the code runs lika a clockwork for me. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im using this code but have made a pair of modifications that I think are of value:</p>
<p>1. The code is failing miserably in regard to performance in a case where the element of the dictionary is an object, especially if it is a recursive structure where the element in itself contains a dictionary, since it will rebind the same dictionary each time it finds a reference to it, ie. for each field in the contained element. I solved that by adding a dictionary to use as a lookup table where I add each model name that has been bound, skipping entries in the key loop if the found dictionary is already bound. In my application this changed the time to bind from 10 seconds to non-noticable, changing the total number of iterations in the key loop from 250 thousand times to a few hundred&#8230;</p>
<p>2. Since I render the dictionary values in a separate partial view this gave the effect on naming that the fields were named like &#8220;dict.[key]&#8221; instead of &#8220;dict[key]&#8220;. I changed the condition for matching the model name to test for both variants, which solved my problem.</p>
<p>With those modifications the code runs lika a clockwork for me. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NTLM authentication in PHP &#8211; Now with NTLMv2 hash checking by Hossain</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2009/09/ntlm-authentication-in-php-now-with-ntlmv2-hash-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-21288</link>
		<dc:creator>Hossain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 05:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=68#comment-21288</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I&#039;m working for a company with almost 5000 employees, all of whose username and pass are stored in central Windows AD and to write all these in the code or in a local DB is impractical. 

So, how can I use this code to check for the username and pass from the central AD instead of the local DB

Please reply, I need this badly.

Thanks
M. Hossain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I&#8217;m working for a company with almost 5000 employees, all of whose username and pass are stored in central Windows AD and to write all these in the code or in a local DB is impractical. </p>
<p>So, how can I use this code to check for the username and pass from the central AD instead of the local DB</p>
<p>Please reply, I need this badly.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
M. Hossain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avahi, setrlimit NPROC and lxc by Matthijs Kooijman</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2011/02/avahi-setrlimit-nproc-and-lxc/comment-page-1/#comment-21246</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthijs Kooijman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=267#comment-21246</guid>
		<description>Just ran into this issue as well (and my previous solution, patching the lxc tools didn&#039;t work due to changes in recent kernels [1]). Disabling the nproc limit seems to fix my issue just fine, thanks for that.

Just for anyone else stumbling upon this post: If you just remove the &quot;rlimit-nproc&quot; line from avahi-daemon.conf, the nproc rlimit gets disabled without affecting any of the other rlimits.

[1]: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29200350</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just ran into this issue as well (and my previous solution, patching the lxc tools didn&#8217;t work due to changes in recent kernels [1]). Disabling the nproc limit seems to fix my issue just fine, thanks for that.</p>
<p>Just for anyone else stumbling upon this post: If you just remove the &#8220;rlimit-nproc&#8221; line from avahi-daemon.conf, the nproc rlimit gets disabled without affecting any of the other rlimits.</p>
<p>[1]: <a href="http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29200350" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29200350</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting the version number of your own Chrome Extension by Liam Clarke</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2010/07/getting-the-version-number-of-your-own-chrome-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-20951</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=163#comment-20951</guid>
		<description>Cheers for that, just looking into this, and was going the route of using  the chrome.management API to iterate over the installed extensions, but your method does exactly what I want without yet another permission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for that, just looking into this, and was going the route of using  the chrome.management API to iterate over the installed extensions, but your method does exactly what I want without yet another permission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dictionary Model Binder in ASP.NET MVC2 and MVC3 by Ivan Jouikov</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2010/11/dictionary-model-binder-in-asp-net-mvc2-and-mvc3/comment-page-1/#comment-20748</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Jouikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=157#comment-20748</guid>
		<description>This simply does not work with production release of MVC3.  The dictionary in web method parameters is always null.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This simply does not work with production release of MVC3.  The dictionary in web method parameters is always null.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pondering per user accounting in Linux by johan</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2009/07/pondering-per-user-accounting-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-20698</link>
		<dc:creator>johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=39#comment-20698</guid>
		<description>+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dictionary Model Binder in ASP.NET MVC2 and MVC3 by Levi</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2010/11/dictionary-model-binder-in-asp-net-mvc2-and-mvc3/comment-page-1/#comment-20287</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=157#comment-20287</guid>
		<description>@Martin - The solution is to use this as the default model binder instead.

http://stackoverflow.com/a/1487076/246561

Where his code says &#039;// do your thing&#039;, instantiate a new DictionaryModelBinder and call BindModel().  

Loune&#039;s binder has to be modified slightly - no need for the constructors and the checks with idicttype can be removed - replace all references with just the modelType instead.

Going to try and get a fork of his code up soon to illustrate better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Martin &#8211; The solution is to use this as the default model binder instead.</p>
<p><a href="http://stackoverflow.com/a/1487076/246561" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/a/1487076/246561</a></p>
<p>Where his code says &#8216;// do your thing&#8217;, instantiate a new DictionaryModelBinder and call BindModel().  </p>
<p>Loune&#8217;s binder has to be modified slightly &#8211; no need for the constructors and the checks with idicttype can be removed &#8211; replace all references with just the modelType instead.</p>
<p>Going to try and get a fork of his code up soon to illustrate better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qemu/KVM sometimes not registering Mouse Clicks when used over VNC by jintoreedwine</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2010/10/qemukvm-sometimes-not-registering-mouse-clicks-when-used-over-vnc/comment-page-1/#comment-20135</link>
		<dc:creator>jintoreedwine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=177#comment-20135</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU!!! This was driving me nuts :) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU!!! This was driving me nuts :) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dictionary Model Binder in ASP.NET MVC2 and MVC3 by Martin Sher</title>
		<link>http://siphon9.net/loune/2010/11/dictionary-model-binder-in-asp-net-mvc2-and-mvc3/comment-page-1/#comment-20027</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Sher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siphon9.net/loune/?p=157#comment-20027</guid>
		<description>Thanks. This is very useful. However the problem I have is that my dictionary is a property within a class. For example my class is 

public class Team
{
     public string Name {get; set;}
     public Dictionary scores {get; set;}
}

How do I modify your example to get his to work with a form and postback.

As I can have other classes with dictionaries in them, I don&#039;t want to have to create specific model binders for each and every class. I just want the dictionary properties to be bound. Out the box the defaultBinder ignores them.

Any help.

Thanks
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. This is very useful. However the problem I have is that my dictionary is a property within a class. For example my class is </p>
<p>public class Team<br />
{<br />
     public string Name {get; set;}<br />
     public Dictionary scores {get; set;}<br />
}</p>
<p>How do I modify your example to get his to work with a form and postback.</p>
<p>As I can have other classes with dictionaries in them, I don&#8217;t want to have to create specific model binders for each and every class. I just want the dictionary properties to be bound. Out the box the defaultBinder ignores them.</p>
<p>Any help.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

